COMPARATIVE PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
Exploring how institutions shape governance, trust, identity, and opportunity through comparative field investigation.
FIELDWORK / ASIA
HK → LK → NP → TW

RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY
Rather than trying to determine whether a policy is “good” or “bad,” my research explores why different groups experience the same institution differently. A regulation can mean protection to one person and uncertainty to another; a public service can build confidence in one place while revealing exclusion in another. I begin by following these differences across professions, generations, and countries. Interviews, observation, and comparative reading help me understand not just what people think, but what institutional conditions make those judgments plausible.
Institutional Trust
How confidence in public institutions is built, tested, and repaired.
Government
How accountability, representation, and public authority are experienced.
Brain Drain
How mobility, opportunity, and credible futures shape decisions to stay or leave.
Rule of Law
How legal protection becomes credible in everyday life.
Identity
How language, belonging, and public voice shape participation.
Economic Development
How markets, work, and public capacity shape opportunity.
COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK
What creates public trust?
Hong Kong · Sri Lanka · Nepal · Taiwan
Why do people migrate?
Nepal · Sri Lanka
How do governments implement policy?
Taiwan · Hong Kong